bauhaus
imaginista
Artistic Work

To Philipp Tolziner

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018,
Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW
​Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

For the exhibition bauhaus imaginista: Moving Away. The Internationalist Architect at Garage Contemporary Museum of Art, the contemporary artist Alice Creischer has been invited to respond to the personal archive of Bauhaus architect Philipp Tolziner. She produced reading of material relating to the architect’s socialist backgrounds and his work in the Soviet Union. 

1 BROOM

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018, Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW, Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

I believe I belonged to a new type of Bauhaus student who already had vocational training. I, for example, was a trained wicker furniture maker who had considerable work and life experience… We had all experienced World War I, from war fever to the November Revolution. I witnessed the Munich Soviet Republic and its overthrow, and also the first wave of National Socialism in Munich.
(Philipp Tolziner: "Mit Hannes Meyer am Bauhaus in der Sowjetunion, Erinnerungen eines ehemaligen Mitglieds der Bauhausbrigade 'Rotfront'", lecture at the Bauhaus in Dessau, 1989).

Tolziner’s father was a broom maker.
The three reasons why twigs are made into a broom.

The Bolshevist revolutionaries did not choose the unfavorable conditions under which the revolution was victorious, but they contributed to creating the unfavorable conditions under which the revolution failed. […] It was above all three historical events from which they drew obvious, albeit incorrect, conclusions

a the quashing of the Paris Commune in 1871 (by the Prussians),

б the oppression of the Russian revolution of 1905, and

B the betrayal of the German Social Democrats in 1914 (the approval in the German parliament of war credits against Russia).

While the first two make it comprehensible why the Bolsheviks placed their revolutionary priority on fighting the counterrevolution with the military and the police, the third event explains the intransigency with which they enforced this policy especially against moderate allies.
(Bini Adamczak: Der schönste Tag im Leben des Alexander Berkman, edition assemblage, Münster 2017.)

2 THREE ARRIVALS AND ONE FAREWELL

a Alexander Berkman at the border, Petrograd, 1920
The revolutionary hymn, played by the military Red Band, greeted us as we crossed the frontier. The hurrahs of the red-capped soldiers, mixed with the cheers of the deportees, echoed through the woods, rolling into the distance like a challenge of joy and defiance. […] A strong desire was upon me to kneel down and kiss the ground […]. Never before, not even at the first caress of freedom on that glorious May day, 1906—after fourteen years in the Pennsylvania prison—had I been stirred so profoundly. I longed to embrace humanity, to lay my heart at its feet, to give my life a thousand times to the service of the Social Revolution. It was the most sublime day of my life. (In 1920, Berkman and a group of 249 political prisoners were deported from the United States to Russia.)
(Alexander Berkman: The Bolshevik Myth, New York 1925, cited in Bini Adamczak, op. cit.)

б Wilfried Franks in Dessau, 1929
I arrived after dark and there was this beautiful glass-fronted building, all lit up, with people walking about inside. If you can imagine, a 50-foot-high area of glass with the lights shining through and the steel girders of the construction four feet back from the glass. You can't believe what an experience that was. You would have been as dumb-struck as I was if you had seen it. I had come into a strange country and had endured a horrible stinking train journey, with people talking in a language I didn't understand, and suddenly I had arrived at this wonderful place and wondered, “Where have I come to?”
(“Former Bauhaus student to speak in Sheffield and Liverpool,” World Socialist Website, November 23, 1999, http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/1999/11/bau-n23.html.)

B Philipp Tolziner in Moscow, February 1931
The train arrived late in the evening. Nobody awaited us at the station, because Hannes Meyer received our telegram only on the next day. The efforts of the lady at the information kiosk to find a hotel room via telephone were futile, and so she let us sleep in her workplace.
(Philipp Tolziner, op. cit.)

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018, Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW, Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018, Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW, Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Spiegelfest

1930

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018, Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW, Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

Two days later the students told me that there was to be a gathering in the square. They had put up a big platform with banners and everything. They said the fascists were coming, and we must be there to hear what they said and to see what they did. […] Then the speaker came out on the platform. He was the leader of the fascists in the state of Thuringia. I couldn't follow anything he said, but I could see that the people I was with were deeply hurt and frightened by what they heard. When we got back they told me, “On Monday we are going to have a Spiegelfest (festival of mirrors).” Monday arrived, and I got up early, at about seven o'clock, and went into the workshop. All the walls of the workshop were draped with mirrors—big mirrors, little mirrors. There were beer barrels on legs and the drink was free. These people that I had been with, were all “practical idealists,” which means they were fighting for an ideal which could actually be achieved. I knew them as such, and here they were making love in public, and drinking and going to sleep against the wall, they were so drunk. And this went on the whole day long. […] It was intended to be a kind of Bacchanalian feast, and it was that. And to such a degree that I couldn't equate it with what they were, and had been, and all that they had taught me to be.
(Wilfred Franks, op. cit.)

3 HOUSES

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018, Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW, Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

The camp bosses […] first deployed him (Tolziner) as an architect in the public administration, then […] in the project workshop of the main administration in Solikamsk. He designed housing barracks and workshops for the camp, residential buildings for the guards, an officers’ mess, and a villa with a pond and a jetty for the wife of the commander of the camp. Compared with the ordinary prisoners, he enjoyed privileges that increased his chances of survival. […] It was in the interests of the camp administration to protect any specialists among the prisoners, because the Gulags were strictly-led businesses geared to fulfilling production plans. The plan could only be fulfilled through the rational exploitation of the prisoners. […] The communal accommodation consisted of rows of wooden barracks resembling the housing blocks of industrial cities. They were oppressively similar to Schwagenscheidt’s sketch on the theme of the May Brigade’s communal housing, as if a joke had turned into thousand-fold reality.
(Ursula Muscheler: Das rote Bauhaus , Berenberg, Berlin 2016, pp. 124–125.)

We are now faced with the main task, we must provide the workers with housing. […] As regards the type of house, we prefer three- or four-story houses with two-, three-, and four-room apartments. […] Only this year have we begun to any extent to build standard type wooden houses, and occasionally building slabs are now being used … Of course, we must use a lot of reinforced concrete in the long run, and we will have to do so … But there is not sufficient iron and cement.
(L. M. Kaganowitsch: Die sozialistische Rekonstruktion Moskaus und anderer Städte der UDSSR, Hamburg/Berlin 1931, in: Harald Bodenschatz & Christiane Post (eds.): Städtebau im Schatten Stalins. Die internationale Suche nach der sozialistischen Stadt in der Sowjetunion 1929–1935, Berlin 2003, p. 32 (note, p. 83) [Translated from German].)

4 SO-CALLED PRIMITIVE ACCUMULATION

Housing stock, fulfillment of the 1st Five-Year Plan, 1927/1928–1932/1933
1927/1928: new urban buildings 5.4 million square meters
Goals 1932/1933: 2.5 million square meters
Results 1932/1933: 7.33 million square meters

Each figure = 1 million square meters
http://www.mxks.de/files/SU/1989kbUdssrIV.html

1930–1933: 500 factories constructed by the firm Albert Kahn Inc.

1928: 3.12 million industrial workers
1932: 6.01 million industrial workers

Each figure = 1 million workers
Harald Bodenschatz & Christiane Post, op. cit., pp. 93–94.

Coal extraction Soviet Union / German Reich
1929: Soviet Union 41.8 t / German Reich 177 t
1938: Soviet Union 418.6 t / German Reich 186.2 t

Each figure, 40.000 tons

Crude iron extraction Soviet Union / German Reich
1929: Soviet Union 4.3 t / German Reich 15.3 t
1937: Soviet Union 14.5 t / German Reich 16 t
1938: Soviet Union 14.7 t / German Reich 18.6 t

1930: more than 60,000 tractors
1931: 100,000 tractors
1934: 250,000 tractors

Each figure = 10.000 tractors
https://maoistdazibao.wordpress.com/2017/11/06/j- w-stalin-das-jahr-des-grossen-umschwungs-1929/

1929: 1,300 peasant rebellions

Each figure = 100 rebellions

Until the end of 1931: 5 million deported peasants

Each figure = 2 million peasants

1933: 2 million prisoners in Soviet labor camps

Each figure = 0,5 million prisoners

The village reacted to the violent acquisition of grain, which was accompanied by mass arrests of the peasantry and the ruin of their businesses, with rebellions against the rulers. […] throughout 1929 more than 1,300 rebellions were registered across the country. […] This prompted the party leadership to massively reinforce the apparatus of repression in the countryside. Based on more recent data, 2.1 million people (1.8 million registered at destination and 0.3 million who died en route) were deported to remote regions as so-called “special settlers,” and 2–2.5 million, or 400,000–450,000 families, were forcibly resettled in their home region. A further 1–1.25 million, or 200,000–250,000 families, “de-kulakized” themselves. All in all, the war against the village affected 5-6 million people. […] In this context, the labor camp system experienced a great upswing. The prisoner economy was a key feature of the first Five Year Plan. In 1929, penitentiary labor colonies and penitentiary labor camps were established. […] Construction projects in Magnitogorsk, Stalingrad, Chelyabinsk, Moscow, Tambov, Saratov, Perm, and many other cities were carried out with the help of forced laborers from the penitentiary labor colonies. […] The number of prisoners in Soviet labor camps in 1933 has been estimated at 2 million. […] The number of industrial workers increased from 3.12 million (1928) to 6.01 million (1932).
(Harald Bodenschatz & Christiane Post, op. cit.)

In themselves money and commodities are no more capital than are the means of production and of subsistence. They want transforming into capital. […] The capitalist system presupposes the complete separation of the laborers from all property in the means by which they can realize their labor. […] The so-called primitive accumulation, therefore, is nothing else than the historical process of divorcing the producer from the means of production. […] In the history of primitive accumulation, all revolutions are epoch-making […] above all, those moments when great masses of men are suddenly and forcibly torn from their means of subsistence, and hurled as free and “unattached” proletarians on the labor-market. The expropriation of the agricultural producer, of the peasant, from the soil, is the basis of the whole process. The history of this expropriation, in different countries, assumes different aspects, and runs through its various phases in different orders of succession, and at different periods.
(Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels: Capital, Vol. 1, Part 7, https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf)

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018, Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW, Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

5 PAPER HOUSE

Alice Creischer, "Für Philipp Tolziner" (For Philipp Tolziner), 2018, Concrete, wood, drawings, textile, mugs, Photo: Ladislav Zajac | KOW, Courtesy of Alice Creischer and KOW, Berlin.

I came to the conclusion that when designing a farm for kolkhoz peasants […] not only the climatic conditions should be a determining factor but also national customs and other local traditions. Nor did it suffice for the project engineer to deal with them theoretically; it was desirable for him to personally experience them. […] Based on these considerations, I attempted in the summer of 1937 to implement everything at an agricultural collective farm that I was familiar with […]. With the development plan of the peasant farm designed together with the kolkhoz peasants […] I returned to Moscow and worked with Tibor Weiner on the competition project. The […] farms are located in a row from east to west […]. Between the homesteads with roofed living terraces facing west lies the garden, open to the street and adjacent to it, on the north side of the house, its farm section, and behind the garden the grain shed. At the time, the kolkhoz peasants were remunerated for their work mainly with products of their labor, grain and so forth. Therefore, the grain shed of the kolkhoz peasant remained […] the testimony […] of his wealth and was consequently given […] a place of honor.
(Philipp Tolziner, op. cit.)

[…] in the socialist period of history the peasant farm was considered as something inferior […] Hence the old idea of grain and meat factories. It is now clear to us that this view has not so much a logical, as a genetic origin. Socialism was conceived as the antithesis of capitalism; born in the dungeons of the German capitalist factories, nurtured in the minds of an urban proletariat haunted by forced labor, by generations that had lost the habit of any individual creative work or thought […].
(Alexander V. Chayanov (Ivan Kremnev): “The journey of my brother Alexei to the land of peasant Utopia” (1920), in: The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1976, pp. 63–108.)

The land issue was the decisive issue of the Russian revolution. At least if the revolution was supposed to be about the “independent movement of the immense majority, in the interest of the immense majority” (Marx/Engels, The Communist Manifesto). […] While in France 55 percent of the population lived in villages, in Germany 40 and in England 20, it was more than 80 percent in Russia. […] The relationship between city and countryside, between workers and peasants is key to understanding the Russian revolution, as it is to understanding its violent failure. For decades, it was shaped by the option between war communism or capitalism.
(Bini Adamczak, op. cit., pp. 73–77.)

If the Bolsheviks had given back the land of the village community as a collective and simultaneously invested a considerable part of the social accumulation fund in its modernization […] the tax in kind could have been kept at a level on which the village community […] would not had to have ruin itself, while the cities would have been spared from chronic undersupply. […] On a third of the land that had previously been owned by the tsar, for the most part forest, the Bolsheviks could have built modern exemplary plants of collective agriculture […]. The Russian working class, if it had oriented itself toward the needs of the village community whose members made up 90 percent of the population, would have been spared from bureaucratically- organized state monopolism, not to mention the Gulag economy. The Soviet economy could have become reality not only nominally but in a continuation of the Paris Commune […]. It could really have become the hinterland for the revolutions in the West and a signal for the anticolonial peasant revolutions in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, and not a deadly trap for those who were forced to seek asylum from fascism in the Soviet Union.(Ulrich Knaudt, in: Bini Adamczak, op. cit., p. 87.)

After 73 years with an open ending, state socialism was finally defeated by state capitalism in the competition for consumption and arms. Capitalism won this game according to its own rules, those of competition. […] Those who had claimed that there is no alternative to liberal capitalism were proven correct. But for other reasons than the ones they assumed. Not because […] the market economy had demonstrated its superiority over a centralized, planned economy, but because up to this moment all historical alternatives had actually disappeared. They were violently driven out of history. […] until time travel is invented, history remains unchangeable […]. That is why we look at the past in both a helpless and a relaxed way […]. The fact that it could have turned out differently, that people could have made other decisions, is, however, also an objection against the present.
(Bini Adamczak, op. cit., pp. 134–135.)

●Author(s)
●Latest Articles
●Article
After the Ball — Hannes Meyer presenting the Bauhaus in Moscow

Hannes Meyer arrived in the USSR just a couple of months after being dismissed from his position as Bauhaus director in October 1930. These months were filled with attempts by Meyer and his supporters to protest this decision through all possible means: media campaigns, open letters, student demonstration and court trials. After arriving in Moscow, Meyer carried on the fight against his unfair dismissal. → more

●Article
Meyer’s Russia, or the Land that never was

It is quite hard to know where to start with Hannes Meyer in Moscow. It’s hard because, while there is plenty of documentation on him and his team in the Bauhaus Brigade—as well as other Western designers and architects (of these, Ernst May is at least as significant as Meyer, as is the Dutch designer Mart Stam, and each went on to produce more substantial work than Meyer after their respective Russian episodes)—the legacy of his work there presents certain difficulties in evaluating. → more

●Article
From Recognition to Rejection — Hannes Meyer and the Reception of the Bauhaus in the Soviet Union

The history of the Stalinist critique of the Bauhaus and Hannes Meyer has two chapters. The first chapter spans the time from 1929 to the Architects’ Congress in the Soviet Union in 1937; the second consists in the condemnation of the Bauhaus in the GDR that took place on the trip by East German architects to Moscow in spring of 1950. This text tells the story of the first chapter. → more

●Article
The “School in the Woods” as a Socio-pedagogical Ideal — Functional Analyses and Photographs by Peterhans

The building theory classes at the Bauhaus focused on imparting a functional understanding of architecture. Building had become a science. As a result, the ADGB Trade Union School was designed logically from the inside out. Walter Peterhans’ photographs of the school images illustrate both the architect’s intentions for the building and the environmental studies conducted by Bauhaus students. → more

●Translation
The Moscow Bauhaus exhibition catalogue (1931)

When Hannes Meyer had emigrated to the Soviet Union in 1930, one of the first things he did was organizing an exhibition about "his" Bauhaus. As early as in February 1931 Meyer had the exhibition “Bauhaus Dessau. Period of Hannes Meyer’s directorship. 1928-1930” already ready to receive the Moscow public. It was shown at the renown State Museum of New Western Art. This is the first English translation of the exhibition catalogue. → more

●Article
The “Hungarian Bauhaus” — Sándor Bortnyik’s Bauhaus-inspired Budapest School Műhely 1928–1938

One of the many Hungarians associated with the Bauhaus, painter and graphic designer Sándor Bortnyik (1893-1976) opened his art and design school, Műhely, in Budapest in 1928 to bring the Bauhaus’s sprit and some of its teaching methods into Hungary. Even if Bortnyik’s school did not have the scope of the Bauhaus, it was an efficient experiment in an independent form of institutionalized education in the field of modern graphic design and typography. → more

●Article
The Spread of the Bauhaus in China

As early as the end of the 19th century up to the beginning of the 20th century, which is to say before the founding of the Bauhaus and after China’s forced opening through war to the outside world, China had already been witness to various experiments in modernization. Such experiments contributed to the laying down of a foundational mindset necessary for the acceptance of the Bauhaus in China’s traditional culture. → more

●Article
Modern Vernacular — Walter Gropius and Chinese Architecture

This essay explores the connection between Walter Gropius and I. M. Pei, as well as the influence of the one on the other. After completing his studies, I. M. Pei worked with Gropius on plans for a university in Shanghai, which he subsequently realized in Taiwan, than in association with Chang Chao-Kang and Chen Chi-Kuan. → more

●Video
Architects' Congress

The passenger ship Patris II transported the participants of the 4th International Congresses of Modern Architecture (CIAM) from Marseilles to Athens and back. Bauhaus teacher Moholy-Nagy, travelling as a “friend of the new building movement” produced this half-hour soundless film as a travel journal. → more

●Video
Jawaja Project — A Case study

The NID was involved in a joint venture with the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad in the adoption for development of a group of villages in Rajasthan. Could local self-reliance emerge from a process of mutual learning between communities and other groups of people? The film shows how leather work and weaving emerged as the opportunity and basis for sustained group effort. → more

●Article
Bauhausmoderne und chinesische Tradition — Franz Ehrlichs Entwurf für ein Haus des Handels in Peking (1954–1956)

In den frühen 1950er-Jahren bestanden gute diplomatische, politische und ökonomische Beziehungen zwischen der Volksrepublik China und der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik. Beide, sich als sozialistisch verstehende Staaten, waren 1949 gegründet worden. In diesem Aufsatz geht es um die besondere Beziehung zur chinesischen Architektur, Kunst und Gestaltung, die Franz Ehrlich entwickelte. → more

+ Add this text to your collection!