●Edition 4: Still Undead

The Design of Information Overload

A Cold War Story

In 1959 Charles and Ray Eames presented their multi-screen film Glimpses of the USA inside Buckminster Fuller’s golden dome at the American Exhibition in Moscow. This propaganda project on behalf of the United States Information Agency  was part of a series of experiments into information overload as a new form of communication and persuasion. It drew on multimedia pedagogies, wartime situation rooms, circus techniques, Hollywood, surveillance, computation, psychology and the news states of distraction in the metropolis. What was radical in 1959 has become every day. We are surrounded everywhere, all the time, by arrays of multiple, simultaneous images. The idea of a single image commanding our attention has faded away. It seems as if we need to be distracted in order to concentrate.

Christopher Faust, Suburban Documentation Project. Metro Traffic Control, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1993. Credit: Courtesy of the artist.

We are surrounded today, everywhere, all the time, by arrays of multiple, simultaneous images—in the streets, airports, shopping centers, and gyms, as well as on our computers and television sets. This was already clear in the 1990s, when the interface became multiple windows and when I started to think about this new condition in which the idea of a single image commanding our attention began to fade away. It seems as if we need to be distracted in order to concentrate, as if we—all of us living in this new kind of space, the space of information—could be diagnosed with attention deficit disorder. The state of distraction in the metropolis, described so eloquently by Walter Benjamin early in the twentieth century, seems to have been replaced by a new form of distraction, which is to say, a new form of attention. Rather than wander cinematically through the city, we now look in one direction and see many moving images juxtaposed, more than we can possibly synthesize or reduce to a single impression. We hardly even notice it. It seems as natural as simply breathing in the information. This effect is multiplied and intensified as screens keep getting closer and closer to our bodies, even becoming part of our body. We now experience the city inside the screen itself; the city we are only vaguely aware of just beyond the edge of the screen.

How would one go about writing a history of this form of perception? Should one go back to television studios or control rooms, with theirs wall of monitors?; or to Cape Canaveral to look at its mission-control room?; or should one even go back to World War II, when so-called situation rooms were envisioned with multiple projectors bringing information from all over the world, presenting it side by side for instant analysis by military commanders and political leaders?

But it is not simply the military in general or war technology in particular that has defined this new form of perception. Designers, architects and artists were involved from the beginning, playing a crucial role in the evolution of multiscreen and multimedia techniques of information presentation. While artists’ use of these techniques tends to be associated with the Happenings and Expanded Cinema of the 1960s, architects were involved much earlier and in very different contexts, such as military operations and governmental propaganda campaigns. Take the 1959 American National Exhibition in Moscow, where the US government enlisted some of the country’s most sophisticated designers. The exhibition was a Cold War operation in which Charles and Ray Eames’s multiscreen technique turned out to be a powerful weapon.

To reconstruct a little bit of the atmosphere: the United States and USSR had agreed in 1958 to exchange national exhibits on science, technology and culture. Following a Soviet exhibit in New York City early in 1959, in July Vice President Richard Nixon arrived in Moscow to open the exhibition, where he engaged in a heated debate with Premier Nikita Khrushchev over the virtues of the American way of life—an exchange that became known as the “Kitchen Debate,” as it took place in the kitchen of a suburban house split in half to allow easy viewing.

The exhibition captivated the national and international media. Newspapers, illustrated magazines and television networks all reported the event. Symptomatically, Life magazine put the wives instead of the politicians on its cover. Pat Nixon appeared as the prototype of the American woman depicted in advertisements of the 1950s: slim, well groomed, fashionable, happy. By contrast, the three Soviet ladies surrounding her appear stocky and dowdy. And while two of them, Mrs. Khrushchev and Mrs. Mikoyan, look proudly toward the camera, a third, the wife of Politburo Central Committee member Frol Kozlov—whose comportment Roland Barthes might have described as the punctum of this particular photograph—cannot avert her eyes from Pat Nixon’s dress.

Envy: that is what the American exhibition apparently was designed to produce. Yet this was not envy of scientific, military or industrial achievements, but envy of washing machines, dishwashers, color televisions, suburban houses, supermarkets stocked full of groceries, Cadillac convertibles, makeup colors, lipstick, spike-heeled shoes, hi-fi sets, cake mixes, TV dinners, Pepsi-Cola and so on. “What is this,” the newspaper Izvestia asked itself in its news report, “a national exhibit of a great country or a branch department store.1

It was for this context that the Eameses produced their film Glimpses of the USA, projecting it onto seven six-by-nine meter screens suspended from the latticework of the vast golden geodesic dome Buckminster Fuller had designed as a theater, measuring a full 76 meters in diameter. More than 2,200 still and moving images presented a day in the life of the United States in 12 minutes. Culled from multiple sources, this selection of images was organized on seven separate film reels, projected simultaneously on seven synchronized projectors.

Cover of Life magazine showing the American and Russian First Ladies at the American National Exhibition in Moscow, August 10, 1959.

Charles and Ray Eames, Glimpses of the USA, showing in the interior of the Moscow World’s Fair auditorium, 1959.

The Eameses did not simply install their film in Fuller’s space: they were involved in organizing the entire exhibition from the very beginning. It was Jack Masey of the United Stated Information Agency (USIA) and the industrial designer and architect George Nelson, who had been commissioned by the USIA to design the exhibition, who brought them onto the team—part of a big Cold War American foreign policy project to, paradoxically, bring Bauhaus thinking back to Europe in the guise of “good design,” both in terms of the display system and the products on view.

Charles and Ray Eames, A sequence of frames form scenes in Powers of Ten, 1968.

Still from Charles and Ray Eames, Powers of Ten, 1977 updated version.

It was decided to incorporate the Eames’s film as the team felt that the “80,000 square feet (7,500 square meters) of exhibition space was not enough to communicate more than a small fraction of what we wanted to say.” Thus, the film was all about information compression—from its incorporation into the exhibition through its placement in Fuller’s minimalist architectonic space—an architecture of information. (Glimpses of the USA turned out to be one of the most popular displays of the exhibition—close to three million people saw it and the dome’s floor had to be resurfaced three or four times during the exhibition’s six-week run.2) Breaking with the fixed perspectival view of the world, the viewer found him or herself in a space apprehensible only with the high technology of telescopes, zoom lenses, airplanes, night-vision cameras, and so on, where there was no privileged point of view. The film commenced with images from outer space occupying all seven screens—stars across the sky, seven constellations, seven star clusters, nebulae—before moving through aerial views of American cities at night—from higher up to closer in—until city lights viewed from above fill the screens.

When the cameras’ respective eyes finally descend to ground level, the cameras zoom into the most intimate of domestic scenes: we see close-ups of newspapers and milk bottles at doors; people having dinner at home, putting babies to sleep. As with Powers of Ten (1968), the Eames’s later and much better-known film, Glimpses of the USA moves from outer space to these close-up details of everyday life. Except that in Powers of Ten the movement would be set in reverse, beginning in the domestic space of a romantic picnic spread in a park in Chicago where a man lies down next to his partner for a postprandial nap. The camera then moves out into the atmosphere and then back down inside the body through the skin of the man’s wrist to microscopic cells and to the atomic level.

Glimpses of the USA breaks with the linear filmic narrative Powers of Ten employs to bring snippets of information, an ever-changing mosaic image of American life. And yet, the message of the film is linear and eerily consistent with the official message Nixon delivered in the Kitchen Debate. From the stars in the sky at the beginning of the film—which the narrative insists are the same in the Soviet Union as they are in the United States—to the people kissing their good-nights and the forget-me-not flowers seen in the last image, the film emphasized universal emotions while at the same time unambiguously reinforcing America’s material abundance. The message of the film was clear: We are the same as you, but, on the material level we have more.

The overall effect of the film is that of an extraordinarily powerful viewing technology, a hyper-viewing mechanism that is hard to imagine outside the very space program the exhibition was trying to downplay.

What kind of genealogy can one make of the Eames’s development of this astonishingly successful technique? It was not the first time they had deployed multiple screens. In fact, the Eameses were involved in one of the first multimedia presentations on record, if not the first. As with the Eames’s participation in the Moscow exhibition, George Nelson set up the commission. In 1952, he had been asked to prepare a study for the Department of Fine Arts at the University of Georgia in Athens and brought along Ray and Charles and the designer Alexander “Sandro” Girard. Instead of writing a report, they decided to collaborate on a “show for a typical class” of fifty-five minutes. Nelson referred to it as “Art X,” and the Eames called it “Sample Lesson.”3 The subject of the lesson was “communications,” and the stated goals included “the breaking down of barriers between fields of learning, making people a little more intuitive[and] increasing communication between people and things.”4 The performance included a live narrator, multiple images (both still and moving), sound and even “a collection of bottled synthetic odors that were to be fed into the auditorium during the show through the air-conditioning ducts.” Eames later said, “We used a lot of sound, sometimes carried to a very high volume so you would actually feel the vibrations. The idea was to produce an intense sensory environment so as to “heighten awareness.”5

It was a major production. Nelson described the team arriving in Athens “burdened with only slightly less equipment than Ringling Brothers. This included a movie projector, three slide projectors, three screens, three or four tape recorders, cans of films, boxes of slides, and reels of magnetic tape.”6 The reference to the circus was not accidental. Speaking with a reporter for Vogue, Charles later argued that “‘Sample Lesson’ was a blast on all senses, a super-saturated three-ring circus. Simultaneously the students were assaulted by three sets of slides, two tape recorders, a motion picture with sound, and peripheral panels for further distraction.”7

The circus, as an event that offered a multiplicity of simultaneous experiences that could not be taken in entirely by the viewer, was the Eames’s model for their design of multimedia exhibitions and the fast-cutting technique of their films and slide shows, where the objective was always to communicate the maximum amount of information in a way that was both pleasurable and effective.

Art X: exhibition/film/slide show/lecture/event. View of lecture hall at the second presentation of Sample Lesson, UCLA, May 1953.

Charles and Ray Eames, Frame from the 16mm film A Communication Primer, 1953.

The Eameses said they “were trying to cram into a short time, a class hour, the most background material possible.”8 As part of the ART X project, they produced A Communication Primer, a film that presented the theory of information, explaining Claude Shannon’s famous diagram of the passage of information, and was subsequently developed in an effort to present current ideas in communication theory to architects and planners, encouraging them to use these ideas in their work. The basic idea was to integrate architecture and information flow. In fact, the information flow was the real architecture.

But the issue was much more than one of efficiency of communication or the polemical need to have multiple examples. The idea was to produce sensory overload. As the Eameses suggested to Vogue, “Sample Lesson” tried to provide many forms of “distraction” instead of asking students to concentrate on a singular message. The audience drifted through a multimedia space that exceeded their capacity to absorb it. The Eames-Nelson team thought that the most important thing to communicate to undergraduates was a sense of what the Eameses would later call “connections” among seemingly unrelated phenomena. Likewise, in Glimpses of the USA, when asked why seven screens, this is what the Eameses said:

The number of screens had to be large enough so that people wouldn’t be exactly sure how many they have seen. We arrived at the number seven. With four images, you always knew there were four, but by the time you got up to eight images you weren’t quite sure.9

One journalist described it as “information overload—an avalanche of related data that comes at a viewer too fast for him to cull and reject it … a twelve-minute blitz.” The viewer is overwhelmed. More than anything, the Eameses wanted an emotional response, produced as much by the excess of images as by their content.

The multiscreen technique went through one more significant development at the 1964 World’s Fair in New York. From the “Sample Lesson” in 1953 to IBM in 1964, the Eameses treated architecture as a multichannel information machine—and, equally, multimedia installations as a kind of architecture.

In every sense, Eames architecture is all about the space of information. The experience for the audience in Moscow was almost overwhelming. Journalists speak of too many images, too much information, too fast. For the Internet generation watching the film today, it would not be fast enough. Coming out of the war mentality, the Eames’s innovations in the world of communication, their exhibitions, films, and multiscreen performances transformed the status of architecture. Their highly controlled flows of simultaneous images provided a space, an enclosure—the kind of space we now occupy continuously without thinking.

Details from the IBM, 14 screen presentation Think during show. From Industrial Design, May 1964, p. 38.

  • 1 Izvestia quoted in: “‘Ivan’ Takes a Look at American Life,” U.S. News and World Report, August 10, 1959, p. 42.
  • 2 Pat Kirkham: Charles and Ray Eames: Designers of the Twentieth Century, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1995, p. 324. From interview of Billy Wilder by Kirkham in 1993.
  • 3 “Grist for Atlanta paper version,” manuscript in the Eames Archives, Library of Congress, box 217, folder 15.
  • 4 John Neuhart, Marilyn Neuhart & Ray Eames: Eames Design: The Work of the Office of Charles and Ray Eames, Harry N. Abrams, New York 1989, p. 177.
  • 5 Owen Gingerich: “A Conversation with Charles Eames,” The American Scholar 46, No. 3 (Summer 1977), p. 331.
  • 6 Stanley Abercrombie: George Nelson: The Design of Modern Design (quoting George Nelson: “The Georgia Experiment: An Industrial Approach to Problems of Education,” manuscript, October 1954), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1995, p. 145.
  • 7 Allene Talmey: “Eames,” Vogue, 15 August 1959, p. 144.
  • 8 Gingerich: “A Conversation with Charles Eames,” p. 332.
  • 9 Ibid., p. 333.
●Latest Articles
On the Reconstruction of Kurt Schwerdtfeger’s “Reflektorische Farblichtspiele” (Reflective Colored Light Plays) from 1922

Kurt Schwerdtfeger conceived of Reflektorische Farblichtspiele in 1921 as a student at the Bauhaus Weimar, studying under Oskar Schlemmer, Johannes Itten, Paul Klee, and Joseph Hartwig. Although the work has been discussed over the years in the context of abstract film, light sculpture, visual music, and expanded cinema, it is first and foremost a work of live performance. Decades before moving image performance would make its appearance in galleries and museums as an art form—a denotation the artistic practice still struggles to attain today—Schwerdtfeger recognized it as such, perhaps due to his immersion in the all-encompassing interdisciplinary approach of the Bauhaus. → more

Lichtwechsel — An den Übergängen vom Kaleidoskopischen zum Stroboskopischen

Die Farblichtspiele von Kurt Schwerdtfeger und Ludwig Hirschfeld-Mack, die im Kontext von frühen abstrakten Filmexperimenten, kinetischen Skulpturen und Bühnenexperimenten 1922 am Bauhaus entstanden, gelten als Vorreiter des Expanded Cinema. Um 1964 wurden sie in einer Zeit rekonstruiert, in der die filmische und lichtkaleidoskopische Avantgarde der 1920er-Jahre von einer neuen Generation von Experimentalfilmern und -theoretikern wiederentdeckt wurde. Deren Umgang mit technischen Medien war weniger von Kollektivitätsgedanken als von individualistischen Selbsterfahrungen und psychotropisch angeregten Selbstentgrenzungen geprägt. → more

Synthesis in Language of Vision — Bauhaus Sources in Gyorgy Kepes’s Dynamic Structure Order

Many of the concepts and concerns Gyorgy Kepes presents in Language of Vision have their roots in the Bauhaus. Both Bauhaus artists and Kepes shared notions of a language of art elements, universal laws, structure, and order, linking these to their utopic hope that art would have a positive effect on mankind. However, a great physical and cultural distance separated the German Bauhaus of the 1920s and 1930s from the post-World War II New Bauhaus in America, where Kepes taught and wrote. → more

Light as a Creative Medium in the Art of György Kepes

Design works employing light refraction, fixation, and reflection were already a feature of László Moholy-Nagy’s teaching at the Bauhaus. When in the summer of 1937 Moholy followed Walter Gropius’s advice and accepted Norma K. Stahle’s invitation to head the New Bauhaus in Chicago, he lay great store by György Kepes’s help in setting up the school in the New World. → more

Interview with Filmmaker and Photographer Ronald Nameth — On filming Warhol’s Exploding Plastic Inevitable and the influence of the New Bauhaus

Ronald Nameth has been working with film, electronics, video, and digital media from the 1960s until today. In addition to Warhol, Nameth has collaborated with several key figures in the arts including musical innovators John Cage and Terry Riley, photographers Aaron Siskand and Art Sinsabauagh, as well as many other artists and performers. In this interview with bauhaus imaginista he recalls how the New Bauhaus method of teaching allowed him to explore the nature of various media to better understand the medium itself and its creative potentials. → more

Vision in Motion —> Information Landscapes — From Stage Props and Camouflage Techniques to Democratic Apparatus and Cybernetic Networks

The examination of approaches, models and strategies for a redefinition of visual culture, the control of images and the shaping of perception made former Bauhäuslers interesting to the American establishment. Their knowledge was incorporated in the development of democratization tools that aid in the fight against fascism and, later, were strategically used against Eastern Bloc countries during the Cold War. → more

Latter-day Bauhaus? — Muriel Cooper and the Digital Imaginary

The Bauhaus is a monument—a book with the physical heft to match its scholarly ambition. Published in 1969 by the MIT Press, The Bauhaus: Weimar, Dessau, Berlin, Chicago stands fourteen inches tall, ten inches wide, and two and-a-half inches thick, weighing in at over ten pounds. It is the revised, expanded, and redesigned translation of editor Hans Wingler’s 1962 German tome Das Bauhaus, 1919–1933: Weimar, Dessau, Berlin. Muriel Cooper, the MIT Press’s first Design and Media Director, consistently rated the book as one of her proudest achievements among the nearly 500 she would design or oversee during her tenure. → more

A Cold War Bauhaus

What happened to the idea of the Bauhaus in the decades after the Bauhaus? This essay examines a key figure at the center of the global spread of the Bauhaus idea after the Second World War: the Hungarian-American artist, designer and visual theorist Gyorgy Kepes. Through his unusual experiments with science and technology, Kepes promoted ideas about interdisciplinarity and collaboration that first originated with Bauhaus modernism in the interwar period. But the conflicts and confrontations that defined Kepes’s career in the United States demonstrate how the Bauhaus became a fraught ideological battlefield during the politically contested years of the early Cold War. → more

Communitas … After Black Mountain College

In the wake of Black Mountain College’s dissolution in 1954, two former students Paul and Vera Williams, left North Carolina and founded Gate Hill Artists’ Cooperative about an hour’s drive outside of New York City. “The Land,” as the Coop was often called by the artists, composers, filmmakers, choreographers, poets, and potters who built their homes and studios in this rural setting, evinced many of the pedagogical lessons of the Bauhaus translated through the American educational experiment in combining art and life that was Black Mountain College. → more

Between Form Sequences and Phase Films — The film experiments of Kurt Kranz

Bauhaus student Kurt Kranz (1910–1997) was a painter, illustrator, graphic artist, typographer, exhibition designer, inventor, programmer, pedagogue, and experimental filmmaker—an explorer of form and color in motion. By combining art, science, and pedagogy, he pursued the interdisciplinary approach of the Bauhaus throughout his life. → more

Festive and Theatrical — The Mask Photos of Gertrud Arndt and Josef Albers as an Expression of Festival Culture

Costuming played a central role at the Bauhaus. Gertrud Arndt’s mask photographs (a series of 43 self-portraits) derive directly from these Bauhaus festivals. As well as a series of nine color photographs taken in direct succession at Black Mountain College in 1940 by Josef Albers. → more

The Bauhaus is dead. — Undead.Undead.Undead.

The influential post-punk band, Bauhaus, helped invent the musical genre and sartorial style of goth-rock. Formed in 1979, their nineminute-long debut single Bela Lugosi’s Dead includes a refrain that has also inspired the title for this exhibition chapter. → more

Case Studies of Modernist Refugees and Emigres to Australia, 1930–1950 — Light, color and educational studies under the shadow of fascism and war

A significant number of central European and German refugees and émigrés sought refuge from war and fascism in Australia during the inter-war and post-World War Two years. These refugees and émigrés introduced an approach to modernism that was crossdisciplinary and derived its inspiration from a systematic approach to arts education. In this paper the authors offer case studies in order to highlight some of their commonalities, such as a commitment to reform education, a systemic interdisciplinary approach to modernist art education and, finally, color-light explorations in art, design and architecture that arise as a consequence of these educational philosophies. → more

The Bauhaus Journey in Britain

The Bauhaus’s teaching approach emphasised the idea of working as a community of creatives and producers rather than merely focusing on the traditional pupil-teacher relationship. In this essay the focus will be on the Bauhaus’s impetus to bring art and design into everyday life highlighting in Great Britain’s visual culture in the 1930s and between 1960s and 70s and how it influenced youth and popular culture during the swinging sixties in London. → more

Bedsit Art in the Leeds Experiment

In the 1970s the city of Leeds was noted as home of “the most influential art school in Europe since the Bauhaus,” and a thriving punk and post-punk music scene. Gavin Butt explores a small art school milieu in which avant-garde experiments in photography, performance, film and sound art gave shape to non-conformist presentations of the body and of sexual and gendered identity. → more

Microfilm and Memex — Lucia Moholy, Photography and the Information Revolution

Considering the role of photography, and particularly, of the Bauhaus photographer Lucia Moholy, in developing and envisaging information systems during and after World War II this paper focuses on the connection between her pre-war practices and her work as the director of the ASLIB Microfilming Service in wartime London, using it to think through the direction of developments in media and information technology by drawing a comparison with Vannevar Bush’s famous essay “As We May Think” (1945). → more

Penguin’s-Eye View — Lázló Moholy-Nagy meets Berthold Lubetkin at the London Zoo

One day in September 1936, Ernestine Fantl, a curator at New York’s Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) and Lázló Moholy-Nagy stood looking at the new Penguin Pond in London Zoo. Fantl was on a research trip for an upcoming exhibition, Modern Architecture in England, that would heavily feature the striking structures Soviet émigré architect Berthold Lubetkin’s firm Tecton had built at the London and Whipsnade Zoos, among them the Penguin Pond. Realizing “that no still photograph could do justice to the pool or its denizens,” on the spot Fantl commissioned Moholy to produce a film about Tecton’s animal enclosures. → more

To train not only for, but also against something! — A plea to think politically about the interdisciplinary art academy

Art colleges where the fine, applied and performing arts are taught under one roof often refer to the historical Bauhaus. Although the institution possessed no separate workshop for music, the experiments on the Bauhaus stage are regarded as prototypical for the further development of interdisciplinary art approaches later in the twentieth century. This text deals with the interdisciplinary art academy on the slide of a deregulated present. It reviews a number of developments to which we have already become accustomed. It is precisely for this reason that we should recall the opportunities offered by interdisciplinary education in both an artistic and political sense. → more

+ Add this text to your collection!